Today’s farming industry is just that…a huge industry. Nearly every aspect of America’s food supply chain has become highly concentrated and is controlled by just a few mega-producers. This growing corporate control has unfortunately been a detriment to farmers, workers, our health, the environment, and the billions of animals who feed us.

To put it in perspective, as of 2015, 66 percent of all hogs were slaughtered by the four largest meatpackers, up from 34 percent in 1980.

While The Farm System Reform Act would not ban the cruel and extreme animal confinement practices that industrialized farms represent, it would put an outright ban on our largest factory farms and finally put the brakes on this mega factory system.

What this proposed bill would do:

    • Ban any new CAFOs and phase out all existing CAFOs by 2040.
    • Hold large meat corporations responsible for the harm caused by the factory farms that raise animals
    • Provide a $100 billion voluntary buyout program for contract farmers to transition away from factory farming
    • Impose stricter environmental standards
    • Help to protect independent family farmers and ranchers
    • Protect livestock and poultry farmers from retaliation if they raise concerns about their contracts or join together in grower associations
    • Prohibit meatpackers from owning livestock more than seven days prior to slaughter or using unfair contracts
    • Prohibit USDA from labeling foreign imported meat products as “Product of USA”.

The negative impacts of CAFOs (concentrated animal feeding operations) are felt far and wide: For those living in proximity, the effects range from an assault on olfactory senses to environmental consequences like pollution of ground water sources and air pollution, both of which result in negative impacts on health.

In addition to pollution, there are the broad societal damages wrought by CAFOs, including the highly reported impacts on workers and the quickly vanishing smaller family farm, enterprises which are quickly disappearing as they do not have the capital to compete with the huge, national corporations whose domination of the industry is ever growing and expanding.

And, last, but not least, there are the animals themselves—poor, mistreated creatures whose lives, from birth to death, are filled with unimaginable suffering unbroken by a single day in which they live life as nature intended.

 

What is the Farm System Reform Act?

The Farm System Reform Act (FSRA), introduced in the Senate by U.S. Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ), on January 21 of this year (and thus far co-sponsored by U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren and U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders), and subsequently, introduced in the house by Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) on May 7, is an attempt to address these issues and others endemic to our nation’s system of raising animals for food.

Cory_Booker   Elizabeth Warren  Bernie_Sanders

Ro khanna

U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna (Joseph Geha/The Argus)

 

The Act has two distinct parts: The first deals with CAFOs directly, and the second modifies and amends the Packers and Stockyards Act.

1 – Amendment to the Packers and Stockyards Act: Part of this new bill aims to amend the Packers and Stockyards Act by strengthening the position of family farmers and ranchers in their dealings with buyers to create a fairer, more level playing field in their competition with the large, corporate farms that are making it almost impossible for them to compete and, thus, survive. One of the amendments to the Packers and Stockyards Act that will be visible to us and the public is a change in labelling requirements. Presently, the USDA allows beef and pork to be labelled “product of USA” even when the animals were raised in other countries. This is clearly advantageous to the big players in the industry and to the disadvantage of smaller, local and family farms which raise their own animals. And it is not fair to the American consumer who is rightly concerned about the source of the foods they and their families eat.

2 – Moratorium on CAFOs: Regarding CAFOs, perhaps the act’s most important provision, is a moratorium on the construction or expansion of such operations from the date of the act’s enactment. Furthermore, CAFOs would finally be banned in their entirety after January 1, 2040.

The definition of what constitutes a CAFO is taken directly from the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), which classifies CAFOs (animal feeding operations) as small, medium, and large. This classification means a lot of producers that most of us would consider to be quite large are not counted as CAFOs. For example, you could have 2,499 pigs, 9,999 sheep, 54,999 turkeys or 29,999 laying hens and not be classified as a large CAFO. For farms with liquid manure handling systems, where the concentration of dry matter ranges from 2-12%, the numbers are even larger, allowing, for example, up to 125,000 chickens.

So, the proposed law would immediately halt the development of new CAFOs and expansion of existing ones and bans them completely 20 years from now.

 

Other Important Factors of Proposed Bill

 

Funds to Transform The Industry

One important aspect of the law is that it would direct the Secretary of the Treasury to provide $10 billion per year to the Department of Agriculture for the purpose of encouraging and aiding farmers to transition their properties from CAFOs to other uses and activities including, presumably, the raising of animals in an environmentally (and, hopefully, more humane) manner. The expectation, should the bill become law, is that these funds will expedite the dismantling of CAFOs.

 

More Responsibility for Environmental Impact

Another, probably less publicized, section of the bill deals with “integrators,” large, vertically integrated conglomerates that dominate animal agriculture. While they control virtually all aspects of the raising of the animals and actually own the animals, the real work is contracted out to the farmers. The Farm System Reform Act would make these entities responsible for many of the large environmental impacts of factory farming—the disposal of dead animals, manure and waste; the discharge of air pollution; and the pollution of ground water.

Additionally, CAFOs would be required to get permits from the relevant authorities for any discharge of pollution beyond their borders. While this portion of the bill does nothing directly to limit or get rid of CAFOs, it does make the real powers beyond their operations responsible for their environmental impact and, thus, deprives them of some of their competitive advantages. Currently, CAFOs discharge 1.4 billion tons of waste per year with no requirement to maintain treatment facilities.

 

Proposed Violations

Punishment for violation of the proposed law’s moratorium on the expansion or creation of CAFOs or the continued operation of a CAFO after January 1, 2040 would be subject to “a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per violation, per day, in addition to any other applicable statutory civil penalty or monetary damages assessed pursuant to any State common law judgment.” (section 102 (c)).

 

Impact on Farmed Animals

Poultry Farm

How does this law affect the lives of the animals that are at the crux of all this?

First, in evaluating the potential impact it may have, we need to understand that there is NO federal legislation of any consequence that controls the treatment of farmed animals.

This legislation doesn’t do that either. Rather, it works from the assumption that the most deleterious impacts of CAFOs are the result of their enormous size and the lack of responsibility for the degradation caused by their operations. By making integrators, the large conglomerates that control animal agriculture in this country, responsible for the resultant damages, and making expansion of their current facilities illegal, it is hoped that these changes will accrue to the benefit of smaller operations. Certainly, if this act becomes law, any growth in consumption (it’s happening whether we like it or not) would have to be from smaller operations.

The unspoken hope is that smaller and, therefore, less capitally intensive CAFOs and more non-CAFO facilities will lead to more humane treatment of the helpless animals which are, after all, the real subject of all of this. It seems logical, but is hardly a guarantee.

 

What You Can Do

Take Action

If this issue is important to you, you are encouraged to contact your Congressional Representative and Senator. If you are sickened by the environmental degradation, the decimation of family farms, the negative impacts on human health and the cruel and systematic abuse of animals, then let your voice be heard. Whatever your opinion, if this is an issue that matters to you, it is your responsibility to make your support known to those in power with the ability to affect change.

Our government works for us. Please contact your rep today and make your voice count.

Find and Contact Your U.S. House Representative

Find and Contact Your U.S. Senator

CFI Logo

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from Crate Free Illinois. 

You have Successfully Subscribed!